H. de Roos - The critique of the toronto exhibition |
|
La Défense: Cécile Goldscheider´s Catalogue Raissonné Instead of examining the indignation publicly voiced,
Goldscheider simply states that Lebossé´s enlargement was "fully
satifactory". But shortly after Rodin´s dead, many critics did not
share that opinion: |
|
There was a storm of criticism directed at Bénédite
for undertaking the posthumous enlargement. Maybe people misunderstood the
enlargement proces and did not realize that for Rodin it was not to be
strictly mechanical. There was published criticism that Lebossé had
betrayed Rodin by not enlarging from the original model in a purely
mathematical way. [Elsen, p. 256] Again, this issue has no direct relevance to the new MacLaren collection and exhibition. But at least the well-documented example of La Défense shows, that the Musée Rodin itself not always has abstained from a practice it criticizes today. Moreover, the very function of a Catalogue Raisonné, published by the prestigious Wildenstein Insitute, is to discuss and settle questions of originality, especially for works whose status has been questioned. Instead of doing so, Cécile Goldscheider simply skipped the questions raised by Albert Elsen. |
|
|
|
|
Notice:
Museum logos appear only as buttons linking to Museum Websites and do not
imply any |